The Charter Township of Waterford, Michigan
Clerk's Office: Betty Fortino (248) 674-6266 Contact Us  

                                            CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WATERFORD
  
                                 5200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
  
                                     WATERFORD, MI 48329
  
                                      February 11, 2002, 6:30 PM
  
                                             - A G E N D A –

 PRAYER: Rev. David Parks of Waterford Church of Christ
APPROVE AGENDA -
APPROVE MINUTES -
APPROVE BILL PAYMENT -

ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Township offices will be closed Monday, February 18, 2002 for Presidents’ Day

AWARDS & PRESENTATIONS:
1. Employee of the Year for 2001, Dennis Wynn of 51st District Court

REPORTS:
1.  Treasurer Dept, November and December, 2001
2.  Building Dept, January, 2002
3.  Community Planning and Development, January, 2002

FIRST INTRODUCTION:
1. Amendments to the General Employee Pension Ordinance (emergency provision adoption)

OLD BUSINESS:
1.  Approval of Amendment to Code of Ordinances, Chapter 11, Article IV, Tampering

 

NEW BUSINESS:
1.  Bid Opening, cabling for 51st District Court
2.  Approval of document scanning service contract for DPW
3.  Approval of lawn service contract extension for DPW
4.  Approval of Waterford and Independence Township agreement for sanitary sewer connection
5.  Appeal of administrative denial of lot split, parcel #13-19-200-035
6.  Approval of in-house study for building a community center
7.  Discussion of policy on issuing liquor licenses

 

 

___________________________________
Betty Fortino, Clerk

 

MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST AT THE CLERK’S DEPT AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE LIBRARY, PLANNING, POLICE AND TREASURER’S DEPARTMENTS. IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, LARGE-PRINT AGENDAS AND MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. BARRIER-FREE PARKING AND ACCESS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE.

 

Minutes of the Waterford Township Board Meeting, held at February 11, 2002,
6:30 PM in Town Hall Auditorium, 5200 Civic Center Drive, Waterford, Michigan.

 

PRESENT:
Carl W. Solden, Supervisor
Betty Fortino, Clerk
Dee Minton, Treasurer
Paul Deni, Trustee
Todd A. Fox, Trustee
David J. Maloney, Trustee
Bette O’Shea, Trustee

OTHERS PRESENT:
Dennis Griffin                                 Dean Campbell                     Matt Cunningham
Greg Eaton                                     Ken Paul                                 Lori Soma
Keith Sova                                     Robert Sharrard                     Sue Camilleri
Linda Zabick                                 Janet Zabick                             Madelynn Lange
Kathy Vickery                                JoanneThornton                       Doug Thornton
Denise Dodd                                 Terry Biederman                     Dick Cartmill
Kay Ragatz                                     Liz Sorles                                Tom Lesnan
Ken Mathers                                   Andrea Wilmes                      Alex Wilmes
William Davis                                 Christie Kay                             Al Ruckey
Jackie Ruckey                                Rick Mielke                             Mark DiSanto
Sharon Hunt                                    Mary Miley                               Cindy Choma

Supervisor Solden called the meeting to order at 6:32 PM. A moment of silence was observed, as there was no minister present. Supervisor Solden then led the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

Moved by Deni,
Supported by Minton, RESOLVED, to approve the agenda with the following change: Remove No. 3 under New Business, "Approval of lawn service contract extension for DPW".

Motion carried unanimously.

 

Moved by O’Shea,
Supported by Fox, RESOLVED, to approve the January 28, 2002 minutes as printed.

Motion carried unanimously.

 

Moved by O’Shea,
Supported by Maloney, RESOLVED, to approve the payment of the bills for February 11, 2002. A list of bills is attached to these minutes.

Motion carried unanimously.

Supervisor Solden made the following announcements:

1.  Township offices will be closed Monday, February 18, 2002 for Presidents’ Day

 

The Awards Committee had selected Dennis Wynn of 51st District Court as the Employee of the Year for 2001. Dennis received his award and congratulations from all present on this fine achievement.

Moved by Fortino,
Supported by O’Shea, RESOLVED, to concur with the Awards Committee and recognize Dennis Wynn of 51st District Court as the Employee of the Year for 2001.

Motion carried unanimously.

 

The following reports were presented:

Treasurer Dept, November and December, 2001
Building Dept, January, 2002
Community Planning and Development, January, 2002

Moved by Deni,
Supported by O’Shea, RESOLVED, to receive the foregoing reports.

Motion carried unanimously.

 

The Board recently approved an amendment to the General Employees Retirement Ordinance for Final Adoption. The Pension Committee’s Attorney, David Parrott, has since recommended changes/corrections. The corrected sections were presented for First Introduction and follow here:

ARTICLE III. RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Sec. 2-73. Definitions.

The following words and phrases, as used in this article, unless a different meaning is clearly indicated by the context, shall have the following meanings:

Accumulated contributions means the sum of all amounts deducted from the compensations of a member, plus all single sum contributions made by the member, and credited to his individual account in the member's deposit fund, together with regular interest thereon.

Beneficiary means any person, except a retirant, who is in receipt of, or who has entitlement to, a pension or other benefit, payable from funds of the retirement system.

Compensation means the salary or base hourly rate, whether payment thereof is deferred to a later date or not, longevity pay, worker's compensation supplement and shift premium. This definition shall be exclusive of any remuneration for payments in consideration for unused sick leave accumulations, for overtime services, basic worker's compensation benefits and for allowances or reimbursement for clothing, equipment, travel expenses, or other similar expenses. The annual compensation of each employee taken into account in determining benefit accruals in any retirement system year beginning after December 31, 2001 shall not exceed $200,000. Annual compensation means compensation during the calendar year or such other consecutive 12-month period over which compensation is otherwise determined under this article (the determination period). In determining benefit accruals in years beginning after December 31, 2001, the annual compensation limit for determination periods beginning before January 1, 2002 shall be $150,000 for any determination period beginning in 1996 or earlier; $160,000 for any determination period beginning in 1997, 1998, or 1999; and $170,000 for any determination period beginning in 2000 or 2001. The $200,000 limit on annual compensation shall be adjusted for cost-of-living increases in accordance with section 401(a)(17)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. The cost-of-living adjustment in effect for a calendar year applies to annual compensation for the determination period that begins with or within such calendar year.

Contract shall mean a written bargain or agreement made between a group (meaning a number of persons classified together) of employees and the Township Board.

Credited service means service credited to a member's service account to the extent provided in this article.

Elected official any person who gains a seat by election of the voters or is duly appointed to serve on the township board of trustees and is properly installed by the township clerk.

Employee means any person in the employ of the township.

Final average compensation means the monthly average of the compensation paid a member during the period of the highest three (3) consecutive years contained within his or her five (5) years of credited service immediately preceding termination of his or her last employment with the township.

Member means any employee who is included in the membership of the retirement system.

Part time employee means any person hired as less than a full time or permanent employee and is designated to work a limited number of hours. Such an employee shall work approximately twenty (20) hours per week during a normal workweek.

Pension means a monthly amount payable by the retirement system throughout the future life of a person or for a temporary period as provided in this article.

Pension committee or committee means the pension committee provided for in this article.

Pension reserve means the present value of all future payments to be made on account of any pension. Such pension reserve shall be computed on the basis of such mortality and other tables of experience, and regular interest, as the pension committee shall from time to time adopt.

Regular interest means such rate or rates of interest per annum, compounded annually, as the pension committee shall from time to time adopt.

Retirant means any member who retires with a pension payable from funds of the retirement system.

Retirement means a member's withdrawal from the employ of the township with a pension payable by the retirement system.

Retirement system or system means the Waterford Township Employees Retirement System created and established by this article.

Service means personal service rendered to the township by an employee of the township.

Temporary employee means any person hired as less than a permanent employee designated to work a limited number of days, not to exceed ninety (90) days in any calendar year.

Township means the Charter Township of Waterford, Oakland County, Michigan, and shall include its several departments, commissions, boards and agencies.

Township board or board means the board of trustees of the Charter Township of Waterford.

Worker's compensation period means the time period a member or retirant is in receipt of worker's compensation arising out of township employment. If the claim is redeemed by payment of a single sum "worker's compensation period" shall be the time period, if any, the member was in receipt of weekly worker's compensation benefits plus the period arrived at by dividing the said single sum by the weekly worker's compensation benefit paid prior to redemption.

The masculine gender shall include the feminine gender, and words of the singular number with respect to persons shall include the plural number, and vice versa.

Sec. 2-128. Required minimum distributions.

(a) In accordance with section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder, which are incorporated herein by reference, a member’s pension shall be distributed to him or her not later than April 1 of the calendar year following the later of:

(1) The calendar year in which the member attains age seventy and one-half (70 1/2) years, or

(2) The calendar year in which the member retires.

(b) With respect to distributions under this article made for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2001, the minimum distribution requirements of section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code will be applied in accordance with the regulations under section 401(a)(9) that were proposed on January 17, 2001, notwithstanding any provision of this article to the contrary. This amendment shall continue in effect until the end of the last calendar year beginning before the effective date of final regulations under section 401(a)(9) or such other date as may be specified in guidance published by the Internal Revenue Service.

Sec. 2-172. Non duty death benefits.

(a) Any member who continues in the employ of the township on or after the date of acquiring ten (10) years of credited service may, at any time prior to the effective date of retirement, but not thereafter, elect Option A provided in section 2-143 in the same manner as if the member were retiring from the employ of the township, and nominate a beneficiary whom the committee finds to be dependent upon the said member for at least fifty (50) percent of his financial support. Prior to the effective date of their retirement, but not thereafter, a member may revoke the said election of Option A and nomination of beneficiary and the member may again elect said Option A and nominate a beneficiary as provided in this subsection. Upon the death of a member who has an Option A election in force, the decedents beneficiary, if living, shall immediately receive a pension computed in the same manner in all respects as if the said member had retired the day preceding the date of death, notwithstanding the fact the decedent may not have attained the age sixty (60) years. The pension shall terminate upon the death of the said beneficiary. No benefits shall be paid under this subsection on account of the death of a member if any benefits are paid under section 2-171 on account of the member’s death.

(b) A member who continues in the employ of the township on or after the date of acquiring ten (10) years of credited service and does not have an Option A election in force as provided in subsection (a) of this section and (1) dies while in the employ of the township, and (2) leaves a widow, a widower, the widow or widower shall immediately receive a pension computed in the same manner in all respects as if the member had (1) retired the day preceding the date of death, notwithstanding that the decedent may not have attained age sixty (60) years, (2) elected Option A provided in section 2-143, and (3) nominated the said widow or widower as beneficiary. The pension shall terminate upon the death of said widow or widower. No benefits shall be paid under this subsection on account of death of a member if any benefits are paid under section 2-171 on account of the member’s death. The ten (10) year credited service requirement shall be reduced to eight (8) years upon a member's attainment of age sixty (60) years.

Sec. 2-188. Eligible rollover distributions.

(a) This subsection applies to distributions made on or after January 1, 1993. Notwithstanding any provision of this article to the contrary that would otherwise limit a distributee’s election under this section, a distributee may elect, at the time and in the manner prescribed by the pension committee, to have any portion of an eligible rollover distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement plan specified by the distributee in a direct rollover.

(1) Definitions.

(i) Eligible rollover distribution: An eligible rollover distribution is any distribution of all or any portion of the balance to the credit of the distributee, except that an eligible rollover distribution does not include: any distribution that is one of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (not less frequently than annually) made for the life (or life expectancy) of the distributee or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of the distributee and the distributee’s designated beneficiary, or for a specified period of ten years or more; any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code; and the portion of any distribution that is not includible in gross income (determined without regard to the exclusion for net unrealized appreciation with respect to employer securities).

(ii) Eligible Retirement Plan: An eligible retirement plan is an individual retirement account described in section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, an annuity plan described in section 403(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a qualified trust described in section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, that accepts the distributee’s eligible rollover distribution. However, in the case of an eligible rollover distribution to the surviving spouse, an eligible retirement plan is an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity.

(iii)Distributee: A distributee includes an employee or former employee. In addition,

the employee’s or former employee’s surviving spouse and the employee’s or former employee’s spouse or former spouse who is the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order, as defined in section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code, or an eligible domestic relations order under the eligible domestic relations order act, are distributees with regard to the interest of the spouse or former spouse.

(iv) Direct rollover: A direct rollover is a payment by the retirement system to the eligible retirement plan specified by the distributee.

(2) If a distribution is one to which sections 401(a)(11) and 417 of the Internal Revenue Code do not apply, such distribution may commence less than 30 days after the notice required under section 1.411(a)-11(c) of the Income Tax Regulations is given, provided that:

(i) The pension committee clearly informs the member that the member has a right to a period of at least 30 days after receiving the notice to consider the decision of whether or not to elect a distribution (and, if applicable, a particular distribution option), and

(ii) The member, after receiving the notice, affirmatively elects a distribution.

(b) This subsection shall apply to distributions made after December 31, 2001.

(1) For purposes of the direct rollover provisions in this section, an eligible retirement plan shall also mean an annuity contract described in section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and an eligible plan under section 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code which is maintained by a state, political subdivision of a state, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or political subdivision of a state and which agrees to account separately for amounts transferred into such plan from this retirement system. The definition of eligible retirement plan shall also apply in the case of a distribution to a surviving spouse, or to a spouse or former spouse who is the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order, as defined in section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code, or an eligible domestic relations order under the eligible domestic relations order act.

(2) For purposes of the direct rollover provisions in this section, a portion of a distribution shall not fail to be an eligible rollover distribution merely because the portion consists of after-tax employee contributions which are not includible in gross income. However, such portion may be paid only to an individual retirement account or annuity described in section 408(a) or (b) of the Internal Revenue Code, or to a qualified defined contribution plan described in section 401(a) or 403(a) of the Internal Revenue Code that agrees to account separately for amounts so transferred, including separately accounting for the portion of such distribution which is includible in gross income and the portion of such distribution which is not so includible.

Moved by O’Shea,
Supported by Deni, RESOLVED, to approve the foregoing (corrected) amendments to the General Employees Pension Ordinance for First Introduction, publish the corrected sections only, and schedule for Final Adoption at a Special Board Meeting to be held February 19, 2002 at 12:00 noon.

Motion carried unanimously.

The following letter was received from Township Attorney Peter Donlin:

Enclosed please find a revised Amendment to the Code of Ordinances relative to our two (2) Tampering Ordinances.

Section 11-130, sub-paragraphs 1 through 3, applicable to motor vehicles, was taken from the State Law and incorporated into our Ordinance years ago. Subsequent to that time, we enacted a General Tampering Ordinance dealing with other property.

Due to a ruling by one of our District Court Judge’s, it is felt that the addition of sub-paragraph 4 to Section 11-130 is necessary inasmuch as the Court Ruling held that Section 11-130 would be the only Ordinance applicable to any Tampering with a motor vehicle.

I have also included a definition of the words "tamper or meddle" in Section 11-129 so as to further clarify the General Tampering Ordinance. There are also some small editing text changes to Section 11-129. I am enclosing a copy of the existing as well as the proposed. This has been approved by the Police Department and is submitted to the Board for action.

The amendment to the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 11, Article IV, Tampering, was on the agenda for final adoption. It follows here:

It is ordained that Chapter 11, Article IV, Offenses Against Property of the Code of Ordinances be amended to read as follows:

Sec. 11-129. Tampering – Generally.

A person commits the offense of tampering if, having no right or authority to do so, and no reasonable ground to believe that he or she has such right, shall tamper or meddle with public property, or private property belonging to another person, irrespective of the consequences of the offense.

The words "tamper" or "meddle" are defined as touching or examining personal property, or moving onto real property, or interfering in said real or personal property without right, propriety or interest.

Violations of this Section shall be subject to punishment and sanctions as set forth in Sec. 1-10 of this Code.

Sec. 11-130. Same – Motor Vehicle.

Any person shall be guilty of violations of this Code who shall:

1.  Intentionally and without authority from the owner, start or cause to be started the motor of any motor vehicle, or maliciously shift or change the starting device or gears of a standing motor vehicle to a position other than that in which it was left by the owner or driver of such vehicle;

2.  Intentionally cut, mark, scratch or damage the chassis, running gear, body, sides, top, covering or upholstering of any motor vehicle, the property of another, or intentionally cut, mash, mark, destroy or damage such motor vehicle, or any of the accessories, equipment, appurtenances or attachments thereof, or any spare or  extra parts thereon being or thereto attached, without the permission of the owner thereof; or

3.  Intentionally release the brake upon any standing motor vehicle, with intent to injure said machine and cause the same to be removed without the consent of the owner; provided that this section shall not apply in case of moving or starting of motor vehicles by the police under authority of local ordinance or by members of fire departments in case of emergency in the vicinity of a fire.

4.  Intentionally open or enter, or attempts to open or enter, any door, hatch, trunk or window of a motor vehicle without permission or authority from the owner or one having right of possession of the vehicle.

This Amendment shall become effective upon final publication in the manner prescribed by law.

Moved by Deni,
Supported by O’Shea, RESOLVED, adopt the amendment to the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 11, Article IV, and Tampering for final adoption foregoing resolution and to publish in the newspaper.

Moved by Fox,
Supported by Minton, RESOLVED, to table the motion for adoption of the ordinance amendment to clarify the language in Sec. 11-129.

Motion carried unanimously.

A bid opening had been scheduled for cabling for 51st District Court. The following bids were opened:

The DataCom Group, Inc.                                 $26,315.00
Cabling Concepts, Inc.                                     $23,941.00
CDW Government, Inc.                                     - no bid –
Sabre Consulting                                             $18,893.00
Analytical Systems, Inc.                                  $18,718.50
REH Associates                                              $26,600.00
#1 EPD Electric Power & Design                      $18,700.00
#2 VODA                                                        $19,552.00
#3 AC Communications, Inc.                            $18,755.64

Moved by Fortino,
Supported by Maloney, RESOLVED, to refer the foregoing bids for cabling to Denise Dodd of the IS Department for award to the lowest, qualified bidder.

Motion carried unanimously.

The following memo was received from DPW Director Terry Biederman:

I have attached a Memo from Harry Gordon for your reference that outlines the project scope and cost to scan into an electronic format approximately 280,000 DPW documents. The proposed cost also includes indexing of the documents so that they can be searched and viewed within the Township’s document management software package On-Base.

I concur with Mr. Gordon’s conclusion and recommendation that utilization of the State of Michigan Contract with Graphic Sciences is the most cost effective and efficient manner in which to do this work, and because the work has already been competitively bid by the State, it also meets the requirements of the procurement policy. As a result, I am requesting that the Board approve the work at the proposed not to exceed price of $26,320.

Funds for this project have been budgeted in the 2002 budget and will come from 59044-84500. In addition, budgeted funds that would have been expended by utilizing additional part-time staff will not be spent resulting in lower labor costs in 2002…

Moved by O’Shea,
Supported by Minton, RESOLVED, to approve the foregoing request for Graphic Sciences to scan DPW documents at a cost not to exceed $26,320.

Motion carried unanimously.

The following memo was also received from DPW Director Terry Biederman:

At the end of the summer in 2001, Waterford Township was contacted by Independence Township concerning the possibility of connecting the referenced property to the Waterford Township sanitary sewer system. The owner of the property, Mr. Ken Matheis, was informed by the Oakland County Department of Human Services (OCDHS) that it was not feasible for him to install a new septic sewer system on his property because it would not provide the required isolation distance for his on-site water supply. I have attached the letter from OCDHS to Mr. Matheis for your reference.

As a result, Mr. Matheis and his family have had to move out of their home until a resolution to the problem could be determined because Independence Township does not have any public sewer available in the area.

Upon contact by Independence Township, a meeting was convened that included Doug Bradley, Carl Solden, Linda Richardson- Director of Public Works for Independence Township, Randy Ford- Representative of HRC which is Independence Township’s Engineering Firm, and myself to investigate and determine the most viable solution to the situation. Upon conclusion of the meeting, the solution settled upon would allow Mr. Matheis to connect into the Waterford Township sanitary sewer system as a single point connection. Details of the connection are as follows:

1.  Mr. Matheis would enter into an agreement regarding sanitary sewer service with Independence Township that outlines, among other things, terms and conditions of his connection to the Waterford Township system. I have attached the document named "Agreement Regarding Sanitary sewer Service" for your reference.

2.  Waterford Township and Independence Township would enter into an  Intergovernmental Agreement for sewer service between the Townships. I have attached the document named "Intergovernmental Agreement for
Sewer Service Between the Charter Township of Waterford and the
Charter Township of Independence" for your reference. This document has also been reviewed and approved by Peter Donlin.

3. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement in Item 2 above, all usage rates for 4589 Edgewood Drive would be charged, paid to and retained by Independence Township. However, Waterford Township would be paid a one-time connection charge by Mr. Matheis of 1.5 times the single unit connection charge of $3,600 or $5,400 as required by ordinance.

4. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement in Item 2 above, the
single residential capacity unit utilized by the connection would be
charged against Independence Township and their purchased capacity in the Clinton-Oakland Interceptor Sewer (COIS). Under this scenario, Waterford Township’s purchased capacity in the COIS would remain the same because the Township’s sanitary sewer system would only be utilized to purvey the sewage from the residence.

5. The Waterford DPW and Engineering Departments have reviewed the
existing sanitary sewer capacity in the area and have determined that the single residence connection would not have a detrimental effect.

I have also attached a copy of the Independence Township January 22, 2002 Board meeting minutes where they unanimously approved the Intergovernmental Agreement between Independence Township and Waterford Township for your reference.

Since all of the requirements of the Waterford Township Water and Sewer Ordinance have been met and there is no detrimental effect on the Township sanitary sewer system, I am recommending that the Board approves the Intergovernmental Agreement between Waterford and Independence Township which will allow for the connection of 4589 Edgewood Drive into the Waterford Township sanitary sewer system.

Moved by Fortino,
Supported by O’Shea, RESOLVED, to approve the foregoing sanitary sewer system connection at 4589 Edgewood Drive, Independence Township, as requested.

Motion carried unanimously.

The following memo was received from Community Planning and Development Director Bob Vallina:

Waterford Township has had a long history of community-mindedness and spirit. The creation of the CAI right after World War II by a group of dedicated citizens is proof of this community spirit and the desire to create a gathering place for the community. However, what a small group of volunteers built and operated as a community center for a rural, cottage-based community of approximately 24,000 residents will not sustain a mature, urban community of 73,000 residents. The need for a center that will embody Waterford’s community spirit has been identified since at least the mid-1980’s. Waterford’s Parks and Recreation Department developed a proposal for a new com-rec center in 1990. A group of citizens worked on the proposal to fund the construction and operation of this plan exclusively through a millage. The plan to fund the com-rec center exclusively through a millage was defeated and the plans were put on the shelf.

Over a decade has passed, the population has grown, and the demand for recreational services has outstripped the capacity of the existing facilities to properly serve this demand. In the midst of our current master plan process, one of the primary goals that citizens have continually identified is the creation of a new community center facility. In fact, in a community survey done as part of the master plan effort, there is significant evidence of support for the construction of a community center and for a millage as a component of the funding solution, provided that it is not above a certain level. A copy of this page from the survey is attached for your information.

The facilities where our limited recreational programs are housed are well over capacity, aging, high-maintenance facilities that require a substantial infusion of funding to maintain them to at least a fair level of service. The Township Board several years ago worked to keep the aging CAI Building open specifically because of the lack of any other facilities in the Township to house these programs. Both the CAI Building and the Senior Center are limited in what they can offer our citizens in the way of recreation and quality of life programs. Add to those the Andersonville Church and Monteith School, and the decisions for funding the continued improvements and maintenance of these buildings becomes a major factor in determining the future of Waterford’s recreational facilities.

It is apparent that this community must decide whether they want to continue with the current limited amount of recreational programs by expending a substantial amount of funds to maintain the current facilities, or if it is time to invest in the future by constructing and operating a new community center.

The Board should not make this decision without a thorough review of the feasibility, cost/benefit estimates, and funding methods. Two options for gathering and assembling this information are available. One option would be for an outside consultant to conduct all phases of a preliminary feasibility study. Another option would be to conduct as much of the feasibility research with existing staff from a number of our departments.

Using an outside consultant for all phases of a feasibility study will be costly. As a benchmark, one consulting company provided an estimate for $45,000 to gather the needed information. No one is sure exactly what the community wishes to see in a

community center, if they want one at all. Allowing an outside consultant to set the parameters for this process, we lose control over the process. Regarding the second option, the Township Planning Commission and Community Planning & Development Department staff are already working on some of the research needed for a feasibility study. With the support of the Township Board, allocation of staff resources from the Parks & Recreation, Community Planning & Development, Building & Engineering, and Fiscal & Human Resources Departments will be devoted for feasibility research and information gathering. Once all information has been gathered and studied, we will bring back for your consideration and discussion an evaluation of the feasibility, cost/benefit, and funding options for implementing the development of a community center.

So that an effective evaluation of the community center concept can be conducted for you, we respectfully request your approval and support of the attached project feasibility timeline and the allocation of staff time and resources for research into, and the preparation of a report on, the feasibility of building a community center.

Proposed Project Task Timeline for Community Center

First Phase (February-April, 2002)

I.  Needs Assessment

Identify existing facilities competitive with community center services (Parks & Rec., CPD staff)

Compile and evaluate demographic data (CPD staff)

Evaluate conducting a survey with community center questions as part of the Recreation Master Plan (Parks & Rec., CPD staff)

II.  Site Assessment

Determine maximum size of site needed for building and parking (Bldg. & Eng., CPD staff)

Looking long-term, will soccer fields need to be relocated to fit building and parking? If so, where? (Parks & Rec. staff)

Evaluate status of Monteith School (Parks & Rec staff)

Additional land acquisition needs to fit building and parking (Township staff)

III.  Partnership Assessment (Township staff)

Waterford School District

CAI

Private Sector

Non-Profit Sector

Evaluate consolidation of agencies/leisure services

Second Phase (April-May, 2002)

I.  Develop a community education campaign strategy

II.  Develop project total cost estimates for evaluation purposes (Bldg & Eng, Parks & Rec staff)

III.  Identification of Financing Mechanisms and Funding Sources (F & HR, Parks & Rec staff)

Moved by Fox,
Supported by Deni, RESOLVED, to approve an in-house study for building a community center.

Motion carried unanimously.

There was some discussion of developing a policy for issuing liquor licenses within the Township. Clerk Fortino stated her department would update the license application. No action was taken at this time.

 

Moved by Deni,
Supported by Fox, RESOLVED, to adjourn the meeting at 7:24 PM.

Motion carried unanimously.

 

____________________________
Betty Fortino, Clerk

 

_____________________________
Carl Solden, Supervisor